The score for crypto
A transparent score from 0 to 100 for coins, built from eight weighted factors.
- Tokenomics93
- Usage64
- Network security95
- Community & developers100
- Revenue & valuationn/a
- Market structure & liquidity94
- Trend & relative strength60
- Fear and Greed79
Example coins
The eight factors
Each factor is normalized to a scale from 0 to 100 and blended with a fixed weighting.
How fast the supply grows and how many tokens are still to be unlocked.
How it is measured
Chiefly the measured growth in supply over the last twelve months, meaning the dilution a holder actually experienced; a supply falling through buybacks or burns counts in the token's favor. Alongside it, with lower weight, what is still to come: the token unlocks of the next twelve months as a share of circulating supply where DefiLlama tracks the unlock schedule, otherwise the overhang still locked up, and the circulating share of maximum supply. A token with no maximum supply at all is marked down, because unbounded issuance is worse than any known ceiling. Source of the unlocks: DefiLlama (defillama.com).
What a coin actually moves, depending on its type.
How it is measured
What a coin actually moves, depending on its type. For proof-of-work chains, active addresses and transactions per day, computed from the block data (active addresses only for Bitcoin, Bitcoin Cash and Dash, whose nodes provide the data needed). For platforms, layer 2 networks and payment networks, the dollar stablecoins held on the chain and their growth over twelve months (growth counts from $100M held), plus DeFi capital locked (TVL) with a smaller weight. For DeFi protocols, capital locked (40%), trading volume over the last 30 days (35%) and open interest (25%). For oracles the value secured, for bridges the volume over the last 30 days, for real-world asset tokens the tokenized assets of the issuer. For AI the usage of the network, for Bittensor the TAO held in the subnet pools (from the Bittensor node of NOWNodes); where it is not measured, it counts as a gap. For DePIN and gaming there is no source that covers every coin of the type, so the factor does not apply and revenue is the core. Source: DefiLlama (defillama.com).
How expensive an attack on the chain would be, for proof of work only.
How it is measured
How expensive an attack on the chain would be: 60% security budget (value of newly issued coins per day that an attacker would have to outbid; logarithmic, 1 million dollars a day gives 55 points, 100 million or more gives 100) and 40% hash rate relative to its own one-year peak, computed from the block data. Applies to proof-of-work chains only.
Commits in the last four weeks, contributor count, share of issues closed (source: GitHub).
What the project earns and how many years of revenue the market value prices in.
How it is measured
Annual revenue and how many years of it the valuation asks for. What is valued is the part that reaches token holders (buybacks, burns, distributions): where DefiLlama reports it as zero, the lowest band applies; where DefiLlama does not report it, total revenue counts and the page says so. The size of the business (35%) uses total revenue, for a chain of its own its fee revenue (for Ethereum essentially the burnt base fee). Revenue below one million dollars counts as small revenue. For platforms, all fees of the chain count (burnt or paid to stakers) plus the revenue of its own protocols: market cap per year of fees on a scale of its own for chains (45%), whether the fees cover the value of newly issued coins (30%, full marks if supply is shrinking) and the size of the fees (25%). For DeFi protocols revenue is the core: without any, the score can reach at most 60. The same applies to any other coin except memecoins for which neither usage, network nor revenue is measured. Source: DefiLlama (defillama.com).
Trading volume in dollars (45%), market capitalization as a measure of size and robustness (35%) and turnover relative to market capitalization, ideally 4 to 10% a day (20%).
The coin's own trend and its strength against the middle of the top 100.
How it is measured
Each coin's own trend: distance to the 200-day average (45%), the gap between the 50- and 200-day EMA (25%) and relative strength over 30 days against the middle of the top 100 (30%). A healthy uptrend earns points, overheating costs them: from 30% above the average the points fall again, to 62 at twice the average and to 50 at 2.4 times. The morning email warns in addition.
Market sentiment, the same for all coins and read contrarian: fear earns points.
How it is measured
The same for every coin, because Bitcoin sets the pace. What counts is MEQIRI's own Fear and Greed Index as the average of the last seven days, so that a single outlier day does not move every score. The Fear and Greed Index page and the bar at the top show the value of the day, so the two figures can differ by a few points. Three quarters of it are eleven sentiment parts (trend, volatility, buying pressure, altcoins, breadth and yearly highs from prices, plus ETF inflows, new money in stablecoins, funding and open interest in futures and the Coinbase premium), one quarter is Bitcoin's valuation, measured by its distance to the 200-week line. Read contrarian: extreme fear earns the most points (index 10 gives 95), extreme greed the fewest (index 90 gives 10). If MEQIRI's own index is unavailable, the Alternative.me index counts for half and Bitcoin's distance to the 200-week line for the other half.
Factors by type
Which factors count depends on what a coin is. A factor that does not apply drops out of the calculation and does not lower coverage. The table is built from the same mapping the score calculates with.
| Type | Tokenomics | Usage | Network security | Community & developers | Revenue & valuation | Market structure & liquidity | Trend & relative strength | Fear and Greed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Proof of work | applies | applies | applies | applies | not used | applies | applies | applies |
| Platforms | applies | applies | not used | applies | applies | applies | applies | applies |
| Payments | applies | applies | not used | applies | not used | applies | applies | applies |
| Layer 2 | applies | applies | not used | applies | applies | applies | applies | applies |
| DeFi | applies | applies | not used | applies | applies | applies | applies | applies |
| Infrastructure | applies | applies | not used | applies | applies | applies | applies | applies |
| Tokenized assets | applies | applies | not used | applies | applies | applies | applies | applies |
| AI | applies | applies | not used | applies | applies | applies | applies | applies |
| DePIN | applies | not used | not used | applies | applies | applies | applies | applies |
| Gaming | applies | not used | not used | applies | applies | applies | applies | applies |
| Memecoins | applies | not used | not used | not used | not used | applies | applies | applies |
| Other | applies | not used | not used | applies | applies | applies | applies | applies |
| Unassigned | applies | applies | applies | applies | applies | applies | applies | applies |
Memecoins are measured only on Tokenomics, Market structure & liquidity, Trend & relative strength and Fear and Greed. Because that shows no substance, their score counts at only 80%: 70 points become 56.
A coin without an assigned type is measured on all eight factors, so every gap damps its score.
When a factor cannot be measured
Factors without a reliable source get no mark of their own, and the page states how much of the applicable weight is actually covered. A coin gets no score at all if it has neither public source code nor locked capital nor revenue of $1M a year or more (PEPE, for example), and neither do exchange tokens and wrapped versions of other coins such as Wrapped Bitcoin: apart from price and supply there is nothing to check.
Reasoning and worked example
Simply leaving them out is not enough. Missing data is not randomly distributed: a token with no chain of its own and no protocol revenue is missing exactly the factors it would have scored badly in. Computed from the measured factors alone, it would come out ahead of a coin that was measured everywhere. So every missing applicable factor counts with its weight at 50 points, the neutral middle. This holds all the way to full coverage: a single missing applicable factor already pulls the score toward 50 in proportion to its weight. If only one input within a factor is missing, the factor is computed from the remaining inputs. Factors that do not apply count for nothing at all. Bitcoin has no protocol revenue and Ethereum no hash rate, so such factors drop out of the calculation and do not lower the coverage. On a day on which the Fear and Greed Index is unavailable, it is missing for every coin alike: it then dampens no score, and the score is computed without it for that day. An example you can check: for a proof-of-work chain 90% of the weight applies, because revenue & valuation (10%) does not. Factors with 75% weight between them are measured and come to 76 points. Only usage (15%) is missing, so 75 of 90 percentage points are covered. The score is then (76 × 0.75 + 50 × 0.15) / 0.9 = 72. This is not a penalty but the honest width of the claim: six measured factors carry less far than seven. It works in both directions: a coin with strong figures loses points through a gap, a weak one gains some. The coin page then also shows the score it would have without the damping.
A coin only gets a score from 70% coverage upward. Below that, a few good figures could carry a small coin ahead of one that was measured everywhere. Its page then shows “not enough data” and it appears in no ranking. The 100 largest coins by market value keep their score below that too, damped as described above and with a note on the thin data.
Score levels
From 70 points the score is Strong, from 50 to 69 Neutral and below 50 Weak, like the traffic light and the stock score. The same levels apply to the sentences on each factor on every coin page.
Changes to the method
Method as of version c21 from 24 Oct 2026, produced by SSM Ventures UG (haftungsbeschränkt). After every change we recalculate the score history with the new method so that comparisons over time hold.
| Date | Version | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 24 Oct 2026 | c21 | For proof-of-work coins such as Dogecoin and Litecoin, newly mined coins now count only as supply growth, not additionally as unlocks. |
Show earlier changes
| Date | Version | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 21 Oct 2026 | c20 | Developer activity without automated commits from bots such as Dependabot, Renovate or GitHub Actions; they raised the count without anyone developing. |
| 18 Oct 2026 | c19 | Open interest as the twelfth signal in the own Fear and Greed Index; 52-week highs against lows as a balance per coin. |
| 18 Oct 2026 | c18 | BONK counts as a memecoin instead of DeFi. |
| 15 Oct 2026 | c17 | Developer data via the GitHub organization, type via the parent protocol on DefiLlama, rating only from 70% data coverage (the 100 largest always). |
| 15 Oct 2026 | c16 | Memecoins count at 80% instead of a cap at 50; tokenised assets (RWA) only with evidence. |
| 15 Oct 2026 | c15 | The Fear and Greed factor is the own index alone; zones at 20, 40, 60 and 80. |
| 15 Oct 2026 | c14 | Own Fear and Greed Index instead of Alternative.me. |
| 15 Oct 2026 | c13 | Usage measured for AI coins, for Bittensor via its subnets. |
| 15 Oct 2026 | c12 | Ten coin types with usage from DefiLlama, token unlocks instead of overhang, DeFi without revenue capped at 60. |
| 15 Oct 2026 | c11 | All coins classified by type, staking net, market value in the market factor. |
