ETFs compared
Costs, returns, risk and composition side by side, plus how much the holdings overlap.
Performance
- Xtrackers NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF 1C
- Amundi Core Nasdaq-100 Swap UCITS ETF Acc
- Amundi Core Nasdaq-100 Swap UCITS ETF Dist
From 16 November 2021. With distributions reinvested.
Key figures
| XNAS.DEXtrackers NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF 1C | LYMS.DEAmundi Core Nasdaq-100 Swap UCITS ETF Acc | NADQ.DEAmundi Core Nasdaq-100 Swap UCITS ETF Dist | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Costs and fund | |||
| Costs (TER) | 0.20% | 0.22% | 0.22% |
| Costs per year on €10,000 | €20.00 | €22.00 | €22.00 |
| Fund size | €2.83B | €7.75B | €7.75B |
| Holdings | 100 | no data | no data |
| Top 10 share | 46.3% | no data | no data |
| Distribution policy | Accumulating | Accumulating | Distributing |
| Provider | Xtrackers | Amundi | Amundi |
| Replication | Physical | Synthetic (swap) | Synthetic (swap) |
| Domicile | Ireland | Luxembourg | Luxembourg |
| Launched | Jan 2021 | no data | Sept 2020 |
| Score and risk | |||
| Holdings score | 70 | 70 | 70 |
| Crash risk | below 1% | below 1% | below 1% |
| Largest drop in 10 years | −31.3% | −31.1% | −31.3% |
| Volatility 1 year | 19.5% | 18.2% | 18.1% |
| Returns | |||
| Return 1 year | +16.9% | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| 3 years p.a. | +21.6% | +22.0% | +21.9% |
| 5 years p.a. | +13.1% | +13.3% | +13.3% |
| 10 years p.a. | no data | +19.8% | no data |
Green marks the best value in each row. Crash risk counts how often the ETF fell by 30% or more within 12 months over the last ten years, with distributions reinvested. If its history is shorter, the longest history of an ETF on the same index counts, or failing that, the same fund on another exchange in the same currency.
Countries
| XNAS | LYMS | NADQ | |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 97.5% | no data | no data |
| Canada | 0.9% | no data | no data |
| Netherlands | 0.9% | no data | no data |
| Brazil | 0.4% | no data | no data |
| China | 0.2% | no data | no data |
| United Kingdom | 0.2% | no data | no data |
Sectors
| XNAS | LYMS | NADQ | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Technology | 60.2% | no data | no data |
| Communication Services | 12.6% | no data | no data |
| Consumer Cyclical | 10.1% | no data | no data |
| Consumer Defensive | 5.6% | no data | no data |
| Industrials | 5.3% | no data | no data |
| Healthcare | 3.8% | no data | no data |
| Utilities | 1.0% | no data | no data |
| Basic Materials | 0.9% | no data | no data |
| Energy | 0.4% | no data | no data |
| Financial Services | 0.2% | no data | no data |
Holdings overlap
For every common holding the smaller of the two weights counts. 100% would mean identical content, 0% nothing in common.
No holdings are available for at least one of the two ETFs.
No holdings are available for at least one of the two ETFs.
No holdings are available for at least one of the two ETFs.
Returns with distributions reinvested, in the trading currency; the price chart shows the traded price. Master data and holdings from FMP. Not investment advice.